Hammurabi’s code and the Ten Commandments Comparison

Hammurabi was ruler of the Babylonian dynasty from 1792-1750 B. C. And is responsible for one of the earliest pro prime tags in history The Laws. The Laws is a form of constitution, an organized statute of social rules, rights of people and legal standards. Hammurabi entangle that he was a sort of instrument of the gods and that it was his role to implement The Laws as a form of blameless justice with a divine authority. The underlying principle for The Laws is an eye for an eye having cause and effect for fleshly actions and moral situations bit setting economic standards.A good simulation of The Laws having a cause and effect while setting an economic standard is stated If a man gives to another silver, gold or anything else on deposit in the presence of witnesses and the latter disputes with him or denies it, they shall call that man to account and he shall doubling whatever he has disputed and repay it. It sets a standard for putting a deposit bolt down and also sets a n effect should one of the parties try to lie about that deposit.The Laws was ahead of its time in many an(prenominal) aspects however slavery is legal therefore everyone is not seen as equal. Even if the penalties were not carried out The Laws would stimulate worked as a threating devices letting the people of the land know of the potential consequences of the actions. Unlike Hammurabis code the decade Commandments list guidelines on worship and holy days. And offers worship as a form of vengeance instead of the real literal form of physical retribution found in Hammurabis code.One example of a law that is similar, deals in financial matters and states If a man delivers to his neighbor money or goods to celebrate and it is stolen out of the mans house. If the thief is found he shall pay double. If the thief is not found the owner of the house shall come near to God, to show whether or not he has put his reach out to his neighbors goods. This is very similar to a law found in H ammurabis code in which the repayment amount is similar for the exact situation.Some of the laws on slavery vary from the deuce codes the Ten Commandments offers compensation directly to the slave one laws reads When a man strikes the eye of a slave mannish or female he shall let that slave go for the sake of that eye. In Hammurabis code a lot of the compensation for damages done to slaves went to their master. Overall I would say that the two laws codes are different. The Ten Commandments gets away from the concept of An eye for an eye as in Hammurabis code. As to the Ten Commandments offers more monetary compensation with a small amount of physical compensation except in extreme cases.