Character study on Inspecter Calls by J.B Priestly :: essays research papers

AT THE END OF MOST PLAY, SOME CHARACTERS HAVE CHANGED AND SOME HAVE NOT. DISCUSS TWO CHARCTERS angiotensin-converting enzyme WHO CHANGES, AND ONE WHO DOESNT IN THE PLAY CALLED AN INSPECTOR CALLS BY J.B. PRIESTLYThe play An Inspector Calls by J.B Priestly, is set on an April evening in 1912. The play concerns the birle family and Gerald Croft quietly celebrating over Gerald and (Mr. birls daughter) Sheila Birlings engagement, when an Inspector arrives unexpectedly amidst their family celebration to enquire about a suicide of a early pregnant girl called, Eva Smith.Through questioning, the inspector uncovers that they all have some kind of an involvement to the young girls death. In the play, some characters ar changed by the Inspectors arrival and news. Some however, remain the same.One character who remains the same is Mrs Birling. In Act One, we are given a general impression of her a well-mannered woman but one who knows her power of authority (being the wife of a well-off b usinessman and the chairwoman of Brumley Womens Charitable Society). In Act Two, Mrs. Birling introduces herself in a polite and respectable manner to the inspector (quite unlike the character that she progresses into) but he finds it onerous to get information out of Mrs. Birling, this can be shown with the these quotes (taken from just after the Inspector has shown Mrs. Birling a photograph of Eva)(Inspector) You recognise her?(Mrs Birling) No. Why should I?Later in the play, the truth comes out that Mrs Birling had met the girl in the photo.Sheila supported the Inspector when Mrs Birling wouldnt give out any information about Eva and tried to persuade her mother to talk but Mrs Birling took her as being rude and insolent and showed that she doesnt like being contradicted. When Mrs Birling does tell the Inspector about Eva coming to her committee for help, she showed no remorse for the young girl. She took Eva as being impertinent when Eva said that her name was Mrs Birling and w as disadvantage against her case. Therefore, she used her power and authority (as being the chairwoman) to influence the others on the committee to abandon her case. Mrs Birling tried to reason with the Inspector about her judgments of Eva and with a attract conscience she said she was, . . . perfectly justified in advising my committee not to allow her claim for assistance.